|
Anjelino v. New York Times Co., No. 986024, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, 200 F.3d 73; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 31523; 162 L.R.R.M. 3040; 81 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 641L; 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P46,364, November 5, 1998, Argued, December 2, 1999, Filed, As Amended February 22, 2000.
26 plaintiffs sued for discrimination based on sex and retaliation, in violation of Title VII, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) et. seq. and the New Jersey Civil Rights Act, Section 10:5; for violation of the Bill of Rights of union members, Title I of the LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. § 411 et seq. and for breach of the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the New York Times Company and the New York Mailers Union No. 6, and breach of the Union's duty of fair representation, in violation of Section 301 (a) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Section 185(a). Legrand v. N.Y. Rest. School/Education Mgmt. Corp., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12893 (D.N.Y., 2004)
Minority admissions officers brought claims for racial, ethnicity and national origin discrimination against the arts and culinary school with respect to racially hostile work environment, distribution of leads, performance evaluations, discipline, salaries, promotions, transfers, and terminations. Defendants made a motion for summary judment o dismiss all claims, but the court denied most of defendants’ motion, finding sufficient evidence of discrimination for a trial on most of the claims. Connell v. Special Touch Home Care Services, Inc. 04 Civ. 1916
Class action for wage violations, including refusal to pay overtime wages, improper wage deductions, denial of benefits, and retaliation, pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act §§7 the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., 1132(a)(1)(B) and (a)(3), and the New York Labor Law §§190 et. seq., §215 and §650 et. seq.; and unjust enrichment. Bethune v. Norrell Corporation, 90 Civ. 1512 (KC), United States District Court Southern District of New York
A class action brought by African American and Hispanic job applicants against an employment agency for steering applicants based on race. Failla v. City of Passaic, Nos. 96-5538, 96-5539 and 96-5835, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, 146 F.3d 149; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10890; 8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 275, January 27, 1998, Argued, May 29, 1998, Filed
Captain of Passaic Police Department sued for violation of his Federal Constitution and civil rights guaranteed under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and for violation of plaintiff's rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Smith v. AVSC Int'l, Inc., 00 Civ. 9832 (RWS), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 148 F. Supp. 2d 302; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8646, June 27, 2001, Decided, June 28, 2001, Filed
Claims for sex and age discrimination, harassment, and retaliation, pursuant to Title VII,the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the New York State and City Human Rights Laws, and breach of implied contract Maldonado v. Esmor Correctional Servs., 97 Civ. 7087 (HB), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12772, August 18, 1998, Decided, August 19, 1998, Filed
Claims for gender discrimination, sexual harassment and retaliation pursuant to Title VII and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. Rosasa v. Hudson River Club Restaurant, 96 Civ. 0993 (DLD), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2665, March 6, 1998, Decided, March 9, 1998, Filed
Claims for race, national origin and ethnicity discrimination and retaliation, and disability discrimination, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §2000 et. seq.), 42 U.S.C. §1981, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws; and for failure to pay wages and overtime pay, and for retaliation, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York State Labor Law. Walker V. Columbia Univ., 93 Civ. 3381 (WK), 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19194 (S. D.N.Y., 1997); 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13610 (S. D.N.Y., 1998)
Claims for age and race discrimination and retaliation, with respect to harassment, termination and other terms and conditions of employment, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Section 1981, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. Baker v. Amtrak, 94 Civ. 0856 (JFK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1314, February 7, 1997, Decided, February 7, 1997, FILED
Claims of race discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. Rivers v. Safesite Nat'l Business Records Management Corp., 94 Civ. 5323 (JSM), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4435, April 8, 1996, Dated, April 9, 1996, FILED
Action for race discrimination pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. Lachicha v. City of New York, 94 Civ. 7379 (LAK), United States District Court For The Southern District Of New York, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2121; 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 377, February 23, 1995, Decided, February 23, 1995, FILED
Claims for violations of due process and equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983; violations of his rights to free speech and association under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983; for discrimination and harassment based on race and ethnicity and retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. §1981 and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws; and for retaliation for whistle-blowing in violation of the New York State Civil Service Law §75-b. Wong v. East River Chinese Restaurant, 92 CV 6000(SJ), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 884 F. Supp. 663; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5211, January 10, 1995, Decided
Waiters sued their restaurant for failure to pay minimum wages and overtime pay, improper deductions and retaliatory termination, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, Section 6, 7 and 15, 29 U.S.C. Section 206, 207 and 215 and the New York State Labor Law Sections 190 et. seq., 215 and 650 et. seq. Kam Shing Chan v. City Of New York, 90 Civ. 5653 (RJW), 1 F.3d 96 (2d Cir., 1993)
Claims for prevailing wages pursuant to 42 USC. Section 1983. Acosta v. Yale Club, 1135N, Supreme Court Of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, 261 A.D.2d 261; 690 N.Y.S.2d 544; 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5471, May 20, 1999, Decided, May 20, 1999, Entered
Waiters sued for discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin and ethnicity in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law, Executive Law §290 et. seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law, §8-107 of the Administrative Code; for fraudulent withholding of tips, denial of regular wages, refusal to pay overtime at the proper rate, and retaliation against plaintiffs for complaining about these wage violations, in violation of the New York State Labor Law §190 et. seq., and §215; and for endangering the health and safety of plaintiffs by failing to properly remove asbestos from the work premises. Bill Rosko Mercer v. Infinity Broadcasting Corp., 96 civ. 8669 (SHS), United States District Court Southern District of New York
Claims for retaliation and race discrimination pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§1981, the New York State and City Human Rights Laws, and for breach of contract. Horkan, et al. v. British Airways PLC, Index No. 45999/96, Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings (co-counsel Leon Greenberg, PC)
Claims for retaliatory discharge for complaining about race and sex discrimination directed at fellow female employee pursuant to the New York State Human Rights Law, Executive Law §290 et. seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law, §8-107 of the Administrative Code; as well as for unpaid wages and retaliatory discharge, pursuant to New York State Labor Law §190 et. seq., and §215. Gomez v. City of New York, et.al., Index No. 16529-01, Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Bronx
Hispanic police officer was discriminated against and retaliated against based on his race and ethnicity, in violation of the New York State and City Human Rights Laws, and was subjected to false arrest and malicious prosecution, for which he brings state common law claims. Marinelli v. Alexis M. Herman, Secretary, Department of Labor, 00 Civ. 1297, United States District Court Southern District of New York
Claim for disability and age discrimination pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §12101 et. seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et. seq. Corine Scott Mack v. Transport Workers Union of America, et al., 00 Civ. 9231 (JSR), United States District Court Southern District of New York
Suit brought by African American female union officer claiming discrimination by her union based on race and sex, and retaliation, in violation of 42 U.S.C. §1981, the New York State and City Human Rights Laws, for violation of the Bill of Rights of union members, Title I of the Labor Management Relations Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. § 411 et seq.; and for failure to pay wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, §6, 29 U.S.C. §206 and the New York State Labor Law §§190 et seq., 650 et seq. Zanowic v. Ashcroft, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3857 (D.N.Y., 2002)
Caucasian United States Marshall who associated with African American Marshalls and complained about the racial discrimination that was directed at African American Marshalls, brought claims that he himself was targeted and discriminated against for his association with and defense of African American Marshalls, in violation of Title VII. Flynn v. N.Y. City Bd. of Educ., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18259 (D.N.Y., 2002)
Claims of teacher for violations of rights to free speech and academic freedom under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983; and for violations of due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. Khan v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23161 (D.N.Y., 2002)
Claims of religion, race, national origin and ethnicity discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §1981, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law, and for detrimental reliance and breach of contract. Blackman v. The Hit Factory, et al., 02101743/02
Claims for assault and battery under the New York common law, and race and sex discrimination with respect to terms of employment, promotions, harassment and a hostile work environment, pursuant to the New York State Human Rights Law, Executive Law §290 et.seq. and the New York City Human Rights Law. Beckles v. Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center
Race and sex discrimination and retaliation claims, with respect to unequal pay, denial of promotions and equal opportunities, as well as harassment and a hostile work environment, pursuant to the New York State Human Rights Law and the New York City Human Rights Law. Gillio vs. Henry Modell & Company, Inc., 03 Civ 2198 (KMW)
Action for equal pay, sex discrimination with respect to harassment, hostile work environment, wages, promotion, termination, and retaliation, and disability discrimination, pursuant to the Equal Pay Act of 1963, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and New York State Labor Law §§194 and 198, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. Priest v. China Online, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19730 (D.N.Y., 2003)
Action for unpaid wages and minimum wages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law, and for breach of contract, detrimental reliance and fraud. Mercado v. Mendes & Mount, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20900 (D.N.Y., 1993)
Action for race, ethnicity, and sex discrimination and retaliation pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §1981, the New York State Human Rights Law and the New York City Human Rights Law. Ri Sau Kuen Chan v. NYU Downtown Hosp., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1419 (D.N.Y., 2004)
Claims for sex harassment and discrimination, race and national origin discrimination, and retaliation pursuant to Title VII, 42 USC Section 1981, and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws. Reiback, et al. v. Children's All Day School, Index No. 00-107091
Whistleblowing action, pursuant to New York State Labor Law §740, for for retaliation for complaints that school was endangering health and safety of students at school. |