Minority admissions officers brought claims for racial, ethnicity and national origin discrimination against the arts and culinary school with respect to racially hostile work environment, distribution of leads, performance evaluations, discipline, salaries, promotions, transfers, and terminations. Defendants made a motion for summary jugdment to dismiss all claims, but the court denied most of defendants’ motion, finding sufficient evidence of discrimination for a trial on most of the claims.

A class action brought by African American and Hispanic job applicants against an employment agency for steering applicants based on race.

Claims for race, national origin and ethnicity discrimination and retaliation, and disability discrimination, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §2000 et. seq.), 42 U.S.C. §1981, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws; and for failure to pay wages and overtime pay, and for retaliation, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York State Labor Law.

Claims for age and race discrimination and retaliation, with respect to harassment, termination and other terms and conditions of employment, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Section 1981, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws.

Claims of race discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws.

Action for race discrimination pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws.

Claims for violations of due process and equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983; violations of his rights to free speech and association under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983; for discrimination and harassment based on race and ethnicity and retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. §1981 and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws; and for retaliation for whistle-blowing in violation of the New York State Civil Service Law §75-b.

Waiters sued for discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin and ethnicity in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law, Executive Law §290 et. seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law, §8-107 of the Administrative Code; for fraudulent withholding of tips, denial of regular wages, refusal to pay overtime at the proper rate, and retaliation against plaintiffs for complaining about these wage violations, in violation of the New York State Labor Law §190 et. seq., and §215; and for endangering the health and safety of plaintiffs by failing to properly remove asbestos from the work premises.

Claims for false arrest, malicious prosecution, violations of due process and and race discrimination brought pursuant to 42 USC Secions 1981 and 1983.

Claims for retaliation and race discrimination pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§1981, the New York State and City Human Rights Laws, and for breach of contract.

Claims for retaliatory discharge for complaining about race and sex discrimination directed at fellow female employee pursuant to the New York State Human Rights Law, Executive Law §290 et. seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law, §8-107 of the Administrative Code; as well as for unpaid wages and retaliatory discharge, pursuant to New York State Labor Law §190 et. seq., and §215.

Hispanic police officer was discriminated against and retaliated against based on his race and ethnicity, in violation of the New York State and City Human Rights Laws, and was subjected to false arrest and malicious prosecution, for which he brings state common law claims.

Teen age African American girls alleging that they were discriminatorily profiled and falsely arrested while in store, because of their race, age and sex, an d brought claims pursuant to the New York State and City Human Rights Laws, as well as for assault, false arrest, negligent hiring, retention, training and supervision.

Suit brought by African American female union officer claiming discrimination by her union based on race and sex, and retaliation, in violation of 42 U.S.C. §1981, the New York State and City Human Rights Laws, for violation of the Bill of Rights of union members, Title I of the Labor Management Relations Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. § 411 et seq.; and for failure to pay wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, §6, 29 U.S.C. §206 and the New York State Labor Law §§190 et seq., 650 et seq.

Caucasian United States Marshall who associated with African American Marshalls and complained about the racial discrimination that was directed at African American Marshalls, brought claims that he himself was targeted and discriminated against for his association with and defense of African American Marshalls, in violation of Title VII.

Claims arising out of improper arrest of young man and his mother, who was trying to protect her son, for false arrest, malicious prosecution, assault, battery, excessive force and denial of medical care while in custody, brought pursuant to 42 USC Secions 1983, 1985.

Claims for assault and battery under the New York common law, and race and sex discrimination with respect to terms of employment, promotions, harassment and a hostile work environment, pursuant to the New York State Human Rights Law, Executive Law §290 et.seq. and the New York City Human Rights Law.

Race and sex discrimination and retaliation claims, with respect to unequal pay, denial of promotions and equal opportunities, as well as harassment and a hostile work environment, pursuant to the New York State Human Rights Law and the New York City Human Rights Law.

Action for race, ethnicity, and sex discrimination and retaliation pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §1981, the New York State Human Rights Law and the New York City Human Rights Law.

Claims for sex harassment and discrimination, race and national origin discrimination, and retaliation pursuant to Title VII, 42 USC Section 1981, and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws.