|
Smith v. AVSC Int'l, Inc., 00 Civ. 9832 (RWS), United States District Court For The Southern District Of New York, 148 F. Supp. 2d 302; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8646, June 27, 2001, Decided, June 28, 2001, Filed
Claims for sex and age discrimination, harassment, and retaliation, pursuant to Title VII,the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the New York State and City Human Rights Laws, and breach of implied contract
Maldonado v. Esmor Correctional Servs., 97 Civ. 7087 (HB), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12772, August 18, 1998, Decided, August 19, 1998, Filed
Claims for gender discrimination, sexual harassment and retaliation pursuant to Title VII and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws.
Lachica V. City Of New York, 94 Civ. 7379 (LAK), United States District Court For The Southern District Of New York, 1995 U.S. Dist. Lexis 2121; 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 377, February 23, 1995, Decided, February 23, 1995, Filed
Claims for violations of due process and equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983; violations of his rights to free speech and association under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983; for discrimination and harassment based on race and ethnicity and retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. §1981 and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws; and for retaliation for whistle-blowing in violation of the New York State Civil Service Law §75-b.
Acosta v. Yale Club, 1135N, Supreme Court Of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, 261 A.D.2d 261; 690 N.Y.S.2d 544; 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5471, May 20, 1999, Decided, May 20, 1999, Entered
Waiters sued for discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin and ethnicity in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law, Executive Law §290 et. seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law, §8-107 of the Administrative Code; for fraudulent withholding of tips, denial of regular wages, refusal to pay overtime at the proper rate, and retaliation against plaintiffs for complaining about these wage violations, in violation of the New York State Labor Law §190 et. seq., and §215; and for endangering the health and safety of plaintiffs by failing to properly remove asbestos from the work premises.
Gomez v. City of New York, et.al., Index No. 16529-01, Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Bronx
Hispanic police officer was discriminated against and retaliated against based on his race and ethnicity, in violation of the New York State and City Human Rights Laws, and was subjected to false arrest and malicious prosecution, for which he brings state common law claims.
Flynn v. N.Y. City Bd. of Educ., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18259 (D.N.Y., 2002)
Claims of teacher for violations of rights to free speech and academic freedom under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983; and for violations of due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983.
Connell v. Special Touch Home Care Services, Inc. 04 Civ. 1916
Class action for wage violations, including refusal to pay overtime wages, improper wage deductions, denial of benefits, and retaliation, pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act §§7 the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., 1132(a)(1)(B) and (a)(3), and the New York Labor Law §§190 et. seq., §215 and §650 et. seq.; and unjust enrichment.
Reiback, et al. v. Children's All Day School, Index No. 00-107091
Whistleblowing action, pursuant to New York State Labor Law §740, for retaliation for complaints that school was endangering health and safety of students at school. |